(http://blog.dispatch.com/dailybriefing/2010/08/twofaced_on_stem_cells.shtml)
Kilroy, a Columbus Democrat, has been unflinching in her support of medical research involving embryonic stem cells. Stivers, a Republican, also has said he favors stem-cell research but, as a state senator, he voted against allowing state bond funds to be spent on that purpose. Stivers explained his vote as a procedural tactic to allow an economic-development package to proceed through the legislative process.And then you get this exchange:
Kilroy responded by questioning Stivers' position on the issue.
"We are calling upon Steve Stivers to take a stand today, and answer a yes or no question: Are you for, or are you against potentially life-saving stem cell research?” the Kilroy campaign asked in a press release.
The Stivers campaign didn't answer the question directly. Here is its statement, in full:
"Congresswoman Kilroy needs to stop lobbing political attacks and start doing her job.
"Steve Stivers stands by his vote on this issue - but while Congresswoman Kilroy attacks him, Steve Stivers isn't standing by the phone waiting for her latest lie and mistruth, Steve Stivers is away serving on duty in the Ohio Army National Guard."
Actually, I want to know the answer to the question, too. It's perfectly reasonable, considering this is definitely going to be something that comes up again in Congress and I want to know how this guy would vote on the issue.